• Aug 25, 2016 News!Vol.4, No.3 has been published with online version. 15 peer reviewed articles from 3 specific areas are published in this issue.   [Click]
  • May 03, 2016 News!Vol. 3, No. 3 has been indexed by EI (Inspec).   [Click]
  • May 03, 2016 News!Vol. 3, No. 2 has been indexed by EI (Inspec).   [Click]
General Information
    • ISSN: 2301-3559
    • Frequency: Quarterly
    • DOI: 10.18178/LNSE
    • Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Jemal Antidze
    • Executive Editor: Ms. Nina Lee
    • Abstracting/ Indexing: EI (INSPEC, IET), DOAJ, Electronic Journals Library, Engineering & Technology Digital Library, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, International Computer Science Digital Library (ICSDL), ProQuest and Google Scholar.
    • E-mail: lnse@ejournal.net
Editor-in-chief
Prof. Jemal Antidze
I. Vekua Scientific Institute of Applied Mathematics
Tbilisi State University, Georgia
I'm happy to take on the position of editor in chief of LNSE. We encourage authors to submit papers concerning any branch of Software Engineering.

LNSE 2014 Vol.2(4): 294-299 IS4SN: 2301-3559
DOI: 10.7763/LNSE.2014.V2.139

Dirt Spot Sweeping Random Strategy

Mian Asbat Ahmad and Manuel Oriol
Abstract—The paper presents a new and improved automated random testing technique named as Dirt Spot Sweeping Random (DSSR) strategy based on the rationale that, “when failures lies in the contiguous locations across the input domain, the effectiveness of random testing can be further improved through diversity of test cases”. The DSSR strategy selects neighboring values for the subsequent tests on identification of failure. Resultantly, selected values sweep around the failure leading to the discovery of new failures in the vicinity. To evaluate the effectiveness of DSSR strategy a total of 60 classes (35,785 lines of code), each class with 30 x 105 calls, were tested by Random (R), Random+ (R+) and DSSR strategies. T-Test analysis showed significantly better performance of DSSR compared to R strategy in 17 classes and R+ strategy in 9 classes. In the remaining classes all the three strategies performed equally well. Numerically, the DSSR strategy found 43 and 12 more unique failures than R and R+ strategies respectively. This study comprehends that DSSR strategy will have a profound positive impact on the failurefinding ability of R and R+ testing.

Index Terms—Software testing, automated random testing, ADFD.

Mian Asbat Ahmad and Manuel Oriol are with the Department of Computer Science, University of York, YO10 5DD, UK (e-mail: mian.ahmad@york.ac.uk, manuel.oriol@york.ac.uk).

[PDF]

Cite: Mian Asbat Ahmad and Manuel Oriol, "Dirt Spot Sweeping Random Strategy," Lecture Notes on Software Engineering vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 294-299, 2014.

Copyright © 2008-2015. Lecture Notes on Software Engineering. All rights reserved.
E-mail: lnse@ejournal.net